Two of the most misunderstood and misinterpreted issues in family court in Arizona today are the family court’s authority to (a) order a child’s therapy
The Court of Appeals decision in Amadore v. Lifgren was partially discussed in this January 7 blog post, but I didn’t mention the court’s other holdings regarding modifications of
I don’t often just post a link here, but I’m traveling this week and this article truly struck me as advice that so many of us could
Rule 6 of the Rules of Procedure for Family Law Cases (notice of change of judge) has changed pretty dramatically. Previously, the change of judge procedure
[originally posted MARCH 2, 2018, updated January 21, 2019] Nicaise v. Sundaram, Arizona Supreme Court, No. CV-18-0089-PR Last March (2018) the Arizona Court of Appeals
The Rules changed on 1/1/2019, so how extensive were the changes? There are a number of substantive changes to cover, and this article in the Arizona Attorney
Amadore v. Lifgren. (2018) While this case involved the modification of spousal maintenance and child support retroactive to the date of filing for modification, and
A 2003 case, Hays v. Gama has been cited repeatedly, and often incorrectly, for the proposition that a trial court cannot exclude evidence that would tend to
The purpose of this post is to give attorneys a template that can be provided to their clients prior to mediation, to make the client
ABOUT MEDIATION, PARENTING COORDINATION, OR PRIVATE REPRESENTATION IN A FAMILY LAW MATTER
4808 North 22nd Street
Suite 200
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Phone: 602-230-9118
Copyright 2021 | All Rights Reserved | Another site by Conroy Creative Counsel